.
Feedback

Courtney Urges Congress to Move Forward on Transportation Bill

Rep. Joe Courtney spoke at a transportation rally in Enfield Wednesday afternoon.

Leaders of Connecticut’s transportation construction industry joined U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney in Enfield Wednesday to plead for Congress to pass a long-term, bipartisan bill to invest in the state’s highway and transit priorities.

A crowd gathered next to the Route 5 bridge over Route 190, which was built in 1966 and was recently rated structurally deficient.

"That's why we're doing it here. There are about 506 others in Connecticut in the same category. If you give them the resources, these guys can make these bridges safe and long-lasting. It's crazy," Courtney said.

In 2009, the Transportation Authorization law that provides annual funding to states expired; since then, funding has been provided through short-term extensions.

Courtney advocates a two-year bill, which has been passed by the Senate, that would maintain the current funding and enable planning for future projects. The problem, he said, is the insistence of House Republicans on a partisan bill that will reduce the state's funding by more than $400 million over the next five years.

"Leadership in Congress is basically causing a self-inflicted wound on the economy of this great country," Courtney said. "The folks that are here today, from management and labor, are ready to go to work to fix the infrastructure of this country, to make our economy function better and to keep us safe. Yet, for the first time in 50 years, the Transportation Authorization bill, which was always a nonpartisan bill going back to Dwight David Eisenhower, is now trapped in this toxic, partisan, scorched-earth politics in the House of Representatives."

Courtney faulted Speaker of the House John Boehner and his supporters.

"John Boehner and the Tea Party members of his caucus blocked consideration of that two-year bill, and instead said we're going to do a 90-day extension," Courtney said. "You can't fix that bridge in 90 days. You need to have a decent amount of horizon for any transportation progress of any magnitude. 90 days is a joke in terms of the priorities we need in this country for mass transit, rail, roads and bridges."

"I was very pleased when I heard Congressman Courtney voted against extension of the transportation bill," said Don Shubert, president of the Connecticut Construction Industries Association. "He basically wants Congress to go forward and pass a bill to get us back to work."

A handout Courtney provided to the media showed 107 Connecticut bridges considered either "serious" or "critical." Among those in northern Connecticut are the Route 74 bridge over I-84 in Tolland, the Charters Brook bridge on Route 140 in Ellington and the Mountain Brook bridge on Route 219 in Granby.

Michael April 5, 2012 at 01:19 pm
What congress needs to do, is stop putting their pet projects in these bills, the bills should be able to stand on their own merit. Until they do this not much will get passed.
It's time to stop blaming each other and start doing what the people elected you to do.
J. Wiley Dumas April 5, 2012 at 01:34 pm
No one disputes that certain bridges and roads need maintenance, but I wonder how many of these jobs will be Union only? Infrastructure projects such as this are where a large portion of 'pork' can be found. Let's not forget the 'Bridge to Nowhere'.
Spiff April 5, 2012 at 04:56 pm
Yeah, they pave roads in this state that don't even need to be repaved. The waste in this state is ridiculous, and we're the ones paying for all of it!
Spiff April 5, 2012 at 05:01 pm
And, that second picture that says, "It's All About the JOBS!" says it all! So, let's just continue to raise taxes and pave roads that don't need to be paved so that we can continue to keep these Union employees busy!
Michael April 5, 2012 at 05:50 pm
@Spiff,
Like that project on Post Office/Town Farms road that has been going on for years. Talk about milking a project
Spiff April 5, 2012 at 07:38 pm
Yeah, the first time I saw that American Recovery and Reinvestment Act sign as I was driving down Town Farms Road I almost regurgitated in my lap. What an absolute joke!
J. Wiley Dumas April 5, 2012 at 08:02 pm
Your outragiously-taxed dollars at ...well, 'Work' doesn't really describe what they do, does it?
Rocky April 5, 2012 at 09:32 pm
@ J. Wiley Dumas. The trend has been to use non union, out of state construction companies for these lowest bid jobs.
There is a problem with this unfortunately. There are many companies employ out of state workers that are incompetent, and all to frequently the jobs are done wrong. Costing more tax money.
J. Wiley Dumas April 5, 2012 at 10:37 pm
I stand corrected. Thank you, Rocky.
Michael April 6, 2012 at 10:15 am
@Rocky, why is it that you automatically lump out of state workers into a group that is incompetent. As a Tax Payer I want the least amount of money spent on a project with as few issues as possible. Remember it is my money, your money being spent on the project not the states money. But lets me fair to the people from out of state, it's not their fault that we the people of CT are so stupid as to keep voting these idiots into office.
Steven Johnston April 6, 2012 at 11:19 am
DownSize DC.org created the "One Subject at a Time Act" (OSTA) to make you more powerful. Most legislation aims to control you, but OSTA will control Congress instead. It will . . .
Stop Congressional leaders from passing unwanted laws by attaching them to popular, but unrelated, bills. Require each bill to be about ONLY one subject, and to stand or fall entirely on its own merits. Make it easier for your elected officials to represent you by allowing them to vote on specific proposals, instead of on groups of bills containing divergent measures. Create a de facto "line item veto" by putting only one measure under the President's pen at any one time. Give you expanded influence by making bad legislation more vulnerable to public opposition.
Rocky April 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
@ Michael, there is painful history where out of state firms have come to Ct. as low bid winners and performing sub standard work. Case in point is the UCONN project at Storrs years back. I want to have my money competently spent also.
There is plenty of blame to be aimed at government. There is a chronic problem of missing oversight.
Michael April 6, 2012 at 12:46 pm
@Rocky. So what you are saying is that NO CT company that produces shody workmenship, thats BS. That is like saying only union workers do quality work. The State engineers who oversaw the project are the ones to blame. They should see the inferior quality of work as it happens and have it fixed then and there.
Rocky April 7, 2012 at 01:12 am
@ Michael. Agreed that the engineers and inspectors that missed the inferior work are culpable.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Enfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something